- From: Lloyd Fassett <lloyd@azteria.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:10:07 -0800
- To: "public-social-interest@w3.org" <public-social-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACKFJ0CPfWQOGHNhtKeM5GaUgstvf7uq3br816y2HvbqegE7UQ@mail.gmail.com>
All, I called James Snell and he can participate between 9am and 12pm PST on Thursday 11/20. James wrote AS 2.0 and is the authority on AS 1.0 / 2.0, interop with other vocabs and extensibility. Please indicate what times work for you here: http://doodle.com/rgngxxzrzxsi7b8g I will e-mail Harry asking for a call in extension and put it in a Calendar request. For context, there was an informative e-mail exchange on the WG listserve about vocabualries this week. As a part of that Evan Prodromou wrote: I don't think we can have effective interoperability of social software clients and servers if we don't have at least some recommended base vocabulary of social concepts with some kind of reasonable extension mechanism. So, we should have an easy and recommended way to describe: - entities like people, groups and contact lists - relationships like one-way follow, two-way friending, group membership, list membership - content life cycle [CRUD] for typical content like text, images, audio and video as well as "office files" - and reactions to content like "likes", replies, and re-shares. Whether that vocabulary is put together from pieces like schema.org, Activity Streams 1.0 base schema, Hydra or SIOC, or if it's generated from whole cloth, is I think an open question. Azteria Inc. Bend, OR (541) 848-2440 (PST)
Received on Saturday, 15 November 2014 01:10:35 UTC