- From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:57:19 +0200
- To: Mark Phillips <M8PHILLI@uk.ibm.com>
- CC: <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Hi Mark, Thanks for the report. Along the way, were there any issues identified that should be added to our test cases? -Eric. On 10/18/11 2:48 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: > To complete ACTION-255 [1] I have documented my findings below on the > testing conducted between the two different IBM products - WebSphere > Message Broker (WMB) and WebSphere Application Server (WAS). > > Both these products have SOAP/JMS capabilities and both products use Axis 2 > for underlying SOAP support, but the SOAP/JMS implementation in each > product is different. Each SOAP/JMS handler was developed independently > from the other. > > Interoperability testing has been carried out between WebSphere Message > Broker 7.0.2 and WebSphere Application Server 7.0.9 and the tests found a > number of defects which have been fixed in subsequent maintenance levels. > The products now pass their interoperability tests, and so have been > demonstrated to be interoperable. > > Regards > Mark > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/255 > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 12:58:49 UTC