- From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:52:34 +0100
- To: Mark Phillips <M8PHILLI@uk.ibm.com>
- CC: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Hi Mark, Thanks for the further work on this! One comment below.... On 11/2/11 3:47 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: > Yes, I'd be happy to update the document - and I'll go with 23rd December - > but in looking at the source I notice another unresolved question : > > <a href="QUESTION: what is the link to our WSB review form?"> > > Rather than linking to a specific form I propose we use the same wording > that the SVG spec used for their Proposed Recommendation on 09 June 2011 > [1]. > > Specifically I propose we replace the text : > > Advisory Committee representatives may send their review comments using > the WBS review form before the deadline of (QUESTION: what is the end of > this review period?). > > with the text : > > W3C Advisory Committee Members are invited to send formal review > comments on this Proposed Recommendation to the W3C Team until 23 > December 2011. Members of the W3C Advisory Committee will find the > appropriate review form for this document by consulting their list of > current WBS questionnaires. > > Any objections / comments? In the email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Oct/0000.html Yves suggested that we simply request feedback to our mailing list. -Eric. > > Regards > Mark > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-SVG11-20110609/ > > > > > From: Eric Johnson<eric@tibco.com> > To: Mark Phillips/UK/IBM@IBMGB > Cc: SOAP-JMS<public-soap-jms@w3.org> > Date: 02/11/2011 13:55 > Subject: Re: Action-258: (Draft #2) Request to progress to Proposed > Recommendation for SOAP-JMS > > > > Hi Mark, > > I might suggest one additional week, at least, because the US has the > Thanksgiving holiday in the middle of that time frame. > > Care to update the document? > > -Eric. > > On 11/2/11 2:42 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: >> Thanks Eric, I have reviewed this, and the disposition of comments and > both >> look good. >> >> One remaining item that I think we need to resolve is the paragraph in > the >> SOTD [1] which begins "The authors of this document consider it to be >> stable". The paragraph ends with the question "(QUESTION: what is the > end >> of this review period?)." >> >> In his note on 3rd Oct [2] Yves suggested at least 4 weeks for this > review >> period - so does December 16th seem reasonable if we publish on November >> 15th. >> >> Regards >> Mark >> >> [1] http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#status >> [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Oct/0000.html >> >> >> >> >> From: Eric Johnson<eric@tibco.com> >> To: SOAP-JMS<public-soap-jms@w3.org> >> Date: 01/11/2011 14:24 >> Subject: Action-258: (Draft #2) Request to progress to Proposed >> Recommendation for SOAP-JMS >> >> >> >> SOAP-JMS WG - the following is my 2nd draft of the request to progress >> to PR, integrating feedback from Yves. >> >> Specifically, Yves noted that it would be appropriate to link to: >> * a report of issues raised during our Last Call >> * declarations of conformance by implementations. >> >> So I've done so. >> >> Further comments welcome! >> >> -Eric >> ====================================================================== >> >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> The SOAP-JMS Working Group requests transition to Proposed >> Recommendation for the SOAP over Java Messaging Service 1.0 > specification. >> Document title >> -------------- >> SOAP over Java Messaging Service 1.0 >> >> URLs >> ---- >> Draft: http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html >> Final: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-soapjms-20111108/ >> >> Abstract >> -------- >> The abstract can be found at: >> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#abstract >> >> Status >> ------ >> The status of the document can be found at: >> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#status >> >> Estimated publication date: >> --------------------------- >> November 15, 2011 >> >> Records >> ------- >> Decision to request the transition: >> (TBD) >> >> Significant Changes Since Previous Publication >> ---------------------------------------------- >> * clarified text around the use of BytesMessage and TextMessage >> * added support for "contentEncoding" >> * improvements to non-normative text >> * miscellaneous editorial changes >> >> For a complete report, see: >> URL-TBD >> >> Evidence That Documentation Satisfies Group's Requirements >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> The background section of the document establishes what the document >> aims to define, and links to those portions of the specification: >> >> > http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#introduction-background > >> >> Evidence that Dependencies Have Been Met >> ---------------------------------------- >> This specification has no normative dependency issues. >> >> Evidence for Wide Review >> ------------------------ >> There exist at least four implementations, including at least one open >> source implementation. Comments arrived on our public mailing list from >> parties previously unknown to members of the WG. >> >> Evidence that issues have been formally addressed >> ------------------------------------------------- >> All issues raised on the public mailing list resulted in issues entered >> in our tracker, and all issues in the issue tracker have been addressed >> to the satisfaction of the person who raised the issue. >> >> Specifically, you can see our disposition of comments since our last >> last public release: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/disposition-of-comments-2011-PR.html >> >> Implementation Information >> -------------------------- >> Three implementations have publicly stated that they pass the test suite >> defined by the WG. >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Aug/0002.html >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Oct/0008.html >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Apr/0003.html >> >> ... and from the Apache CXF project, over a sequence of emails ... >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C201104051045.04251.dkulp%40apache.org%3E > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C4DACB9C1.4080008%40tibco.com%3E > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C201104191250.00242.dkulp%40apache.org%3E > >> >> Objections >> ---------- >> None raised >> >> Patent disclosures >> ------------------ >> None >> >> >> Eric Johnson, >> Chair, SOAP-JMS working group >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 09:54:15 UTC