public-soap-jms@w3.org from February 2010 by thread

ISSUE-29: In 2.6.2.3. the behaviout of the responding node is too prescriptive about the destination to which the response must be sent [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 26 February)

ISSUE-28: topicReplyToName is missing from WSDL schema and the "Binding of Properties to URI" table [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 26 February)

Minutes: 2010-02-23 Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 23 February)

Agenda for 2010-02-23 conference call Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 23 February)

Minutes 2010-02-16 Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 16 February)

Applied resolution for action 141 Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 16 February)

Applied resolution for issue 24 (ACTION-140) Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 16 February)

Applied resolution for issue 25 (ACTION-139) Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 16 February)

Agenda for 2010/02/16 meeting Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 16 February)

Minutes 2010-02-09 Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 9 February)

Agenda for 2010-02-09 conference call Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 9 February)

Minutes 2010-02-02 Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 2 February)

Regrets for today's call Phil Adams (Tuesday, 2 February)

Agenda for 2010-02-02 conference call Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 2 February)

ACTION-134 - propose alternate wording to resolve ISSUE-26 Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 2 February)

Last message date: Friday, 26 February 2010 19:37:15 UTC