public-soap-jms@w3.org from February 2010 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• Re: Regrets for today's call (Tuesday, 2 February)

Eric Johnson

• Agenda for 2010-02-23 conference call (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Agenda for 2010/02/16 meeting (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Agenda for 2010-02-09 conference call (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Agenda for 2010-02-02 conference call (Tuesday, 2 February)
• ACTION-134 - propose alternate wording to resolve ISSUE-26 (Tuesday, 2 February)

Mark Phillips

• Minutes: 2010-02-23 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Minutes 2010-02-16 (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Applied resolution for action 141 (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Applied resolution for issue 24 (ACTION-140) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Applied resolution for issue 25 (ACTION-139) (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Minutes 2010-02-09 (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Minutes 2010-02-02 (Tuesday, 2 February)

Peter Easton

• RE: Agenda for 2010-02-23 conference call (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Agenda for 2010/02/16 meeting (Tuesday, 16 February)

Phil Adams

• Regrets for today's call (Tuesday, 2 February)

Rokicki, Derek

• RE: Agenda for 2010-02-23 conference call (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Regrets for today's call (Tuesday, 2 February)

SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-29: In 2.6.2.3. the behaviout of the responding node is too prescriptive about the destination to which the response must be sent [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Friday, 26 February)
• ISSUE-28: topicReplyToName is missing from WSDL schema and the "Binding of Properties to URI" table [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Friday, 26 February)

Last message date: Friday, 26 February 2010 19:37:15 UTC