Re: IETF "area" for URI scheme

Greetings Eric, it is unclear to me what use is made of the area element, 
I cannot find it mentioned in the XSLT. I have also looked at a couple of 
other URI Schemes and cannot see what they may have specified. 

So, if we are to do anything I would would agree with Amy that 
applications is the most appropriate.

Regards, Roland




From:
Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
To:
Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Cc:
SOAP/JMS (list) <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Date:
29/10/2008 20:33
Subject:
Re: IETF "area" for URI scheme




I'm pretty sure that you shouldn't put a working group abbreviation 
there, unless you belong to the working group.

I would guess that you want one from the enumeration: applications, 
general, internet, operations and management, real-time applications 
and infrastructure, routing, security, transport.

I don't think it's transport.  I think it's applications.  It would be 
meta-applications, if such a thing existed (JMS is an "application 
layer" by almost any measure, since it's an API rather than a protocol; 
SOAP is likewise pretty clearly in the application layer, no lower).

два копейки

Amy!
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:16:03 -0700, Eric Johnson wrote:
> 
> I'm going back through the XML RFC document for the URI scheme, and 
> found this element:
> 
>  <!-- This needs to be one of the defined IETF Areas -->
>  <area>AREA</area>
> 
> This seems like it is supposed to be from this page:
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/wg-dir.html

> 
> 
> I think the appropriate thing to put here is tsvwg, but I don't 
> know.  Perhaps better to leave it blank?
> 
> Anyone with any insight?
> 
> -Eric.
> 
> 
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com









Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU