- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:29:17 -0400
- To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
- Cc: SOAP/JMS (list) <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
I'm pretty sure that you shouldn't put a working group abbreviation there, unless you belong to the working group. I would guess that you want one from the enumeration: applications, general, internet, operations and management, real-time applications and infrastructure, routing, security, transport. I don't think it's transport. I think it's applications. It would be meta-applications, if such a thing existed (JMS is an "application layer" by almost any measure, since it's an API rather than a protocol; SOAP is likewise pretty clearly in the application layer, no lower). два копейки Amy! On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:16:03 -0700, Eric Johnson wrote: > > I'm going back through the XML RFC document for the URI scheme, and > found this element: > > <!-- This needs to be one of the defined IETF Areas --> > <area>AREA</area> > > This seems like it is supposed to be from this page: > http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/wg-dir.html > > > I think the appropriate thing to put here is tsvwg, but I don't > know. Perhaps better to leave it blank? > > Anyone with any insight? > > -Eric. > > -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2008 20:31:52 UTC