- From: Wilson, Kirk D <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:34:54 -0400
- To: "Kumar Pandit" <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>, <public-sml@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <F9576E62032243419E097FED5F0E75F3056951E6@USILMS12.ca.com>
<johnarwe_> As a consequence of this, if the spec prescribes or allows different behavior when a feature is supported vs not supported, two implementations, one of which supports the feature and the other of which does not support the feature, may exhibit different behaviors. <johnarwe_> ...and Kirk can fix the awkward "of which"s in there\ I suggest the following: As a consequence of this, if the spec prescribes or allows different behavior when a feature is supported vs. not supported, then two implementations may exhibit different behaviors if the one implementation supports the feature and the other doesn't (optional: support that feature). Or equivalently (if you don't like the two "if"s), ...if the spec prescribes....and one implementation supports a feature and another doesn't, then these two implementations may exhibit different behaviors. Kirk Wilson, Ph.D. Research Staff Member, CA Labs 603 823-7146 (preferred) Cell: 603 991-8873 This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please delete this e-mail and notify the sender immediately. ________________________________ From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kumar Pandit Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 10:05 PM To: public-sml@w3.org Subject: [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-09-25 SML Teleconference
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 10:35:38 UTC