W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > October 2007

RE: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme

From: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:23:20 -0700
To: "bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org" <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>, "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D95F90884B51CF4F83E887862D5D3708DA875A0339@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>

Kirk is right. I believe that is what we agreed to.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:58 AM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme


http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4675





------- Comment #12 from kirk.wilson@ca.com  2007-10-30 10:58 -------
I thought that the conclusion we came to was that Level 1 conformance meant
conformance to the SML-IF schema (with an "a") and Level 2 conformance meant
support for the sml:uri scheme by BOTH consumers and producers.  (We
back-tracked on the earlier decision that only producers would have to support
the sml:uri scheme once we adopted the 2 level conformance standard.)
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:30:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:24:23 UTC