- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:58:23 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4675 ------- Comment #12 from kirk.wilson@ca.com 2007-10-30 10:58 ------- I thought that the conclusion we came to was that Level 1 conformance meant conformance to the SML-IF schema (with an "a") and Level 2 conformance meant support for the sml:uri scheme by BOTH consumers and producers. (We back-tracked on the earlier decision that only producers would have to support the sml:uri scheme once we adopted the 2 level conformance standard.)
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 10:58:35 UTC