W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > October 2007

RE: [bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema

From: Wilson, Kirk D <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:03:21 -0400
Message-ID: <F9576E62032243419E097FED5F0E75F30327637E@USILMS12.ca.com>
To: "Kumar Pandit" <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>, <public-sml@w3.org>
Yes, I agree as well.


Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.
Research Staff Member

CA Labs

603 823-7146



From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Kumar Pandit
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:20 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Cc: Kumar Pandit
Subject: [bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema


I think this proposal from Sandy should be easy to agree on. Most of us
agreed on this informally during one of our meetings. Pratul & I have
already entered our agreement in the bug text. 


------- Comment #1 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047>
>From Pratul Dublish <mailto:pratul.dublish@microsoft.com>  2007-09-24
04:27:49 [reply <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047> ]

I agree with Sandy's proposal with extension point


      <xs:any processContents="skip"/> 

      <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"

              minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> 


------- Comment #2 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047>
>From Kumar Pandit <mailto:kumarp@microsoft.com>  2007-09-24 07:20:43
[reply <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047> ] ------- 

I agree with this proposal.



Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 11:03:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:24:23 UTC