- From: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:19:52 -0700
- To: "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
- CC: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 02:26:14 UTC
I think this proposal from Sandy should be easy to agree on. Most of us agreed on this informally during one of our meetings. Pratul & I have already entered our agreement in the bug text. ------- Comment #1<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047> From Pratul Dublish<mailto:pratul.dublish@microsoft.com> 2007-09-24 04:27:49 [reply<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047>] ------- I agree with Sandy's proposal with extension point <xs:sequence> <xs:any processContents="skip"/> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> ------- Comment #2<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047> From Kumar Pandit<mailto:kumarp@microsoft.com> 2007-09-24 07:20:43 [reply<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047>] ------- I agree with this proposal.
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 02:26:14 UTC