- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:56:09 +0000
- To: "Smith, Virginia (HP Software)" <virginia.smith@hp.com>
- Cc: public-sml@w3.org
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 17:01 +0000, Smith, Virginia (HP Software) wrote: > Is the text, which I marked in red below, necessary? I think it could be removed, especially since the first sentence makes it clear which URI we're talking about. > The reason I want to remove it is that it could be construed that > the "resolved inter-document reference" is the stripped URI when it is > really the entire URI reference. My reading of section 3.3.6 leads to think that "resolved inter-document reference" are: - references within the same document - references that have an alias. I didn't think it had anything to do whether the URI had a fragid or not. > Perhaps move the red text to immediately follow "Otherwise, if the > URI reference" instead. That would work as well. Philippe
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 17:56:39 UTC