- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:22:07 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4746
Summary: clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements
Product: SML
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Interchange Format
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: johnarwe@us.ibm.com
QAContact: public-sml@w3.org
context: Since documents may have been signed using XML Signature
[XML-Signature] or have had cryptographic digests made of them for other
purposes, documents exchanged using SML-IF must be invariant with respect to
XML Canonicalization. [Canonical XML]
This is currently in what appears to be a non-normative section. I do not see
any corresponding normative text for the MUST. Is this requirement still
relevant, and is it already covered by normative text elsewhere or does it need
to be added to normative text?
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 17:22:09 UTC