- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:22:07 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4746 Summary: clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements Product: SML Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Interchange Format AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: johnarwe@us.ibm.com QAContact: public-sml@w3.org context: Since documents may have been signed using XML Signature [XML-Signature] or have had cryptographic digests made of them for other purposes, documents exchanged using SML-IF must be invariant with respect to XML Canonicalization. [Canonical XML] This is currently in what appears to be a non-normative section. I do not see any corresponding normative text for the MUST. Is this requirement still relevant, and is it already covered by normative text elsewhere or does it need to be added to normative text?
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 17:22:09 UTC