[Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements


           Summary: clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements
           Product: SML
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: Interchange Format
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: johnarwe@us.ibm.com
         QAContact: public-sml@w3.org

context: Since documents may have been signed using XML Signature
[XML-Signature] or have had cryptographic digests made of them for other
purposes, documents exchanged using SML-IF must be invariant with respect to
XML Canonicalization. [Canonical XML]

This is currently in what appears to be a non-normative section.  I do not see
any corresponding normative text for the MUST. Is this requirement still
relevant, and is it already covered by normative text elsewhere or does it need
to be added to normative text?

Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 17:22:09 UTC