- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:39:39 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4665 Summary: Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Product: SML Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Interchange Format AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org QAContact: public-sml@w3.org Section 3.3.1 defines URI equivalence with an appeal to RFC 3986: To determine whether two URIs are equivalent, consumers MUST use the definition of URI equivalence given by RFC 3986 [IETF RFC 3986]. Examining the RFC, one doesn't find a single definition of equivalence, but a "ladder" of increasingly aggressive normalizations. It's not clear whether level of equivalence defined in 3986 is intended to be used by SML-IF impelementations. I think the reference needs to be more specific about what concept of 3986 is being appealed to.
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 20:39:42 UTC