- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:39:39 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4665
Summary: Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986
Product: SML
Version: unspecified
Platform: Macintosh
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Interchange Format
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org
QAContact: public-sml@w3.org
Section 3.3.1 defines URI equivalence with an appeal to RFC 3986:
To determine whether two URIs are equivalent, consumers
MUST use the definition of URI equivalence given by RFC
3986 [IETF RFC 3986].
Examining the RFC, one doesn't find a single definition of
equivalence, but a "ladder" of increasingly aggressive
normalizations. It's not clear whether level of equivalence
defined in 3986 is intended to be used by SML-IF impelementations.
I think the reference needs to be more specific about what
concept of 3986 is being appealed to.
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 20:39:42 UTC