- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:37:22 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4652 Summary: Should SML-IF be described at the octet level or the infoset level? Product: SML Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Interchange Format AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org QAContact: public-sml@w3.org At various points (e.g. 3.2), the SML-IF document describes SML-IF documents (and other XML documents) at the level of the octet stream. Some WG members believe that it would be better to define SML-IF exclusively (or at least primarily) at the level of the XML information set of the documents in question, and to leave all details of the character encoding scheme and similar issues to the XML parsing layer of the stack. This affects the description of SML-IF documents in the third paragraph of 3.2, the description of physical embedding of model documents in the fifth paragraph (and following) of 3.2, and possibly other parts of the spec. (A separate issue is to be raised concerning the encoding question in 3.2 paragraph 3.)
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 22:37:24 UTC