- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:46:02 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4639 Summary: Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs Product: SML Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org QAContact: public-sml@w3.org In the current version of SML, sml:acyclic is defined with reference to (directed) cycles in directed graphs whose arcs are references of the specified type and whose nodes are documents containing elements which serve either as the source or the target of the references. Given that in many cases one could choose to organize a body of data either in many small documents (say, 20,000 'student' documents, each containing one 'student' element) or one large document (with a container and 20,000 'student' elements), it would clearly be useful for schema authors and system designers to be able to prohibit cycles either on document graphs (as currently supported) OR on graphs whose nodes are elements. Any use case for cycle checking on document-graphs is also a potential use case for cycle checking on graphs of elements. There may be implementation-related reasons to support document graphs and not element graphs. Some WG members suggested, for example, that it's easier to point at documents than at elements in a stable way, so that it's easier to maintain an index for checking checking cycles in document graphs than in element graphs. The WG will need to weigh design issues (and the misfit between references pointing at elements not documents, vs. cycles being checked only on graphs of documents) and implementation issues.
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 00:46:06 UTC