Re: Wiki page to refine survey questions

Jeanne, all,

I’m sorry I’ve not been able to attend the Tuesday meetings given their hour, and so missed discussions leading up to this survey.

There is a foundational question I don’t see addressed in the survey (though it may have already been discussed and agreed to): will conformance claims remain optional?  Will we describe more than one approach to making an (optional) claim (in the F2F we talked a fair bit about adjectival and task-based, and the survey seems to suggest that adjectival/scoring are either/or vs. something the site might choose between depending upon what best works for them)?

I also wonder how valuable a date is, in the absence of other data.  If 20% of the site contents changes each month, a date of 3 weeks ago may be already “out of date”.  If less than 2% changes each year, a date of 6 months ago is likely more than fine.


Regards,

Peter
--
Peter Korn | Director, Accessibility | Amazon Lab126
pkorn@amazon.com

From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 at 7:26 AM
To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Wiki page to refine survey questions
Resent-From: <public-silver@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 at 7:25 AM

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.



We want to put out a survey to AGWG and Silver about depreciating
accessibility scores.  I have set up a simple wiki page for the survey
questions.  Please help me draft the survey by describing the option you
favor with a concise paragraph description.

https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Survey_on_depreciating_scores