Re: Summary & Minutes of Silver meeting

Apologies for my inaccurate summary.

Peter said that a site that had errors on automated tests would not be 
able to reach bronze.  We did not have consensus on this, but it is a 
direction for more exploration.

jeanne

On 2/22/2020 11:20 AM, Korn, Peter wrote:
> Jeanne, Detlev,
>
> I remember the conversation slightly differently: first, that it would 
> be useful in the scoring example to cite which tests were automated or 
> not, and then second, that a site that was NOT able to succeed using 
> only automated tests couldn’t reach bronze.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>> On Feb 22, 2020, at 4:12 AM, Detlev Fischer 
>> <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> wrote:
>>
>>  I think the briefest look at the Conformance Challenges section
>> https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/master/conformance-challenges/index.html#Appendix-A 
>>
>> …makes it utterly clear how limited a merely automatic test will be: 
>> most SCs just cannot be conclusively tested automatically. So IMO 
>> accepting that as „bronze“ would entirely remove credibility from a 
>> new conformance scheme under WCAG 3.0
>> Detlev
>>
>>
>>> Am 21.02.2020 um 22:54 schrieb Jeanne Spellman 
>>> <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>:
>>>
>>>  1. TheScoring Exampl
>>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LfzTd_8WgTi0IUOOjUCRfRQ7e7__FRcnZow4w7zLlkY/>e
>>>     has a new introduction to (hopefully) explain it more clearly.  
>>>     We discussed whether we could say that a website or project that
>>>     passed a WCAG 2 automated test could pass at bronze, but there
>>>     were objections.  To be continued...
>>>
>>