Jeanne, Detlev, I remember the conversation slightly differently: first, that it would be useful in the scoring example to cite which tests were automated or not, and then second, that a site that was NOT able to succeed using only automated tests couldn’t reach bronze. Regards, Peter On Feb 22, 2020, at 4:12 AM, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> wrote: I think the briefest look at the Conformance Challenges section https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/master/conformance-challenges/index.html#Appendix-A …makes it utterly clear how limited a merely automatic test will be: most SCs just cannot be conclusively tested automatically. So IMO accepting that as „bronze“ would entirely remove credibility from a new conformance scheme under WCAG 3.0 Detlev Am 21.02.2020 um 22:54 schrieb Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>: 1. The Scoring Exampl<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LfzTd_8WgTi0IUOOjUCRfRQ7e7__FRcnZow4w7zLlkY/>e has a new introduction to (hopefully) explain it more clearly. We discussed whether we could say that a website or project that passed a WCAG 2 automated test could pass at bronze, but there were objections. To be continued...
Received on Saturday, 22 February 2020 16:20:30 UTC