Minutes from Silver Content Meeting of 11 February 2020

== Summary ==

Reminder for AGWG members to complete the survey on the Silver name.  
Community Group members can email Jeanne with their thoughts and Jeanne 
will enter them into her survey entry.   We briefly discussed the name 
with several people expressing concern over the W3C making the WC part 
of WCAG.

We reviewed the changes made to draft in response to comments. There was 
substantial revision of the Guidelines Introduction to clarify scope, 
relationship with other WAI specs, and that Silver is not 
backward-compatible to WCAG 2.  We added clarification of normative and 
informative sections.  Heading comments were mostly applicable to all 
the guidelines, as they had to do with the design of the Explanation 
(which we tentatively agreed to rename to "Headings How To").  We are 
going to label the Guideline and Method How-to with a plain language 
version of normative v. informative as well as add design elements to 
make it more clear.

We will review the Visual Contrast comments on Friday. Conformance will 
be addressed in the Tuesday evening (ET) meeting.  There is a request to 
discuss including a normative link to RFC 2119 (standard with 
definitions of "must", "should", etc) on Friday.  This was not done for 
WCAG and there are arguments for including them in Silver.  It means 
that we would have to use any of the 2119 terms very carefully with 
their standard meaning.

Reminder that if you are attending the CSUN Face to Face (F2F) meeting, 
please complete your row of the spreadsheet that Jeanne emailed you.

== Minutes ==

https://www.w3.org/2020/02/11-silver-minutes.html

Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2020 23:52:13 UTC