- From: jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:36:21 +0200
- To: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Cc: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMpCG4EDV0pGOH5o1V5NKNUmHvw9o71+mmEB3OhNgbB-82Qjbg@mail.gmail.com>
Also the ratings are questionable as you might have a load more button (extra headings might be loaded, so what is the total), what is the visual heading (legends, labels, badges, caption element, other visual way of expressing a heading like item etc, what is the severity or criticality of the heading present (a mega menu might contain 20 headings right while the main content might have 7 wrong) etc. Op di 25 aug. 2020 om 13:30 schreef jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>: > Heading role and level property is mixed in the example, this creates > challenges in scoring we probably do NOT want as it can get complex with > lots of variations. > > Also there is a lot to challenge in the scoring assumptions, like: > > "Critical failures for the method or specific tests > If headings necessary to locating the content necessary to accomplish the > task or follow the path are not coded as headings, that is a critical > failure " > > What if Legends <legend> are used? Makes not using headings NOT a critical > failure (and more of those) > > When we say "headings are missing" what do we mean? It will be subjective > when they are needed exactly in all possible scenarios. > > In short I think we might need a example completely worked out with > consensus on all aspects in the example to base others on as we might be > missing on validity, consistency and reliability. > > Op di 18 aug. 2020 om 01:39 schreef Jeanne Spellman < > jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>: > >> Rachael, Francis and I worked on this new template for writing Methods >> today. I'd like to discuss it tomorrow if we have time. >> >> It is a template and an example using the template. The example uses a >> WCAG2 Technique, because it was fast. There is also an Appendix section >> that you can ignore. It's interesting to try to do Methods based on >> Functional Outcomes instead of guidelines. We had to work out a lot of >> little details of what goes where. >> >> For any content subgroup that has not written any Methods yet, please try >> it out. If you have written Methods, you can try to to move your content >> to this new template, or you can send me what you have and I will fill out >> as much of the Method template as I can, and then go back to you with >> questions. >> >> Method Template and Example >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KP6A9TmSkhgHvsTxu4FFGC9duzHKU-OBM_tcULC5Mew/> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2020 11:36:45 UTC