W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > October 2019

RE: What if Silver didn't have levels?

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:44:59 +0000
To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
CC: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Message-ID: <DBBPR09MB30451A176EAE0053FC3C8795B9920@DBBPR09MB3045.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Interesting thought, and I agree with some aspects like:
  > The "good", "better", "best" model is problematic:
  > * The levels are effectively arbitrary, and they're inconsistent depending on the nature of your disability/disabilities.
  > What if we just used a single continuous scale, let's say for the purposes of this discussion from 0 to 100, without defining "good", "better", "best" steps along the way?

However, I think one important role WCAG has had is setting the minimum bar at a level regulators can use. I.e. These criteria are important and we got consensus that they are feasible for everyone to tackle.

(Noting a couple of exceptions where Canada & the EU have removed things like live captions / audio desc.)

With that in mind, if there is a 0 - 100 score, how about having one level?

For sake of argument, that level could be 60%, but then scoring more looks better.

Displayed like the Chrome Devtools where it goes green above a certain point, and people look for how to increase the points [1].

I still think (but haven't had time to work on this) that it would be best to start at 100 and take away points for barriers, but in either direction I think Silver should set a base level.

It would also be important to have some guidelines (e.g. flashes) that instantly limit your score to under the level, they have to be dealt with to get to that passing level.



1] https://developers.google.com/web/tools/lighthouse/v3/scoring 
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2019 08:45:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:46 UTC