- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:55:54 -0400
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
== Summary == 1) Reviewed the comments from the AGWG meeting today about the Challenges of Conformance document. Jeanne thought it was well received. A member of AGWG said that WCAG-EM addressed all the problems in the Challenges document. Peter reviewed WCAG-EM before the Silver meeting and didn't see a lot of congruence. Jeanne agreed. Jeanne and Shawn had discussed the publication priorities after the AGWG call and doubt that we would have time to publish it in November. 2) We reviewed where we left off last week on Conformance minimum. We discussed the email from Leonie about removing all levels. Some feedback: a) that some minimum is needed to use Silver in a regulatory environment (a requirement), b) it didn't provide any protection from an organization scoring all their points for one disability and ignoring others, and c) the scoring would need to be set up so it didn't have a top, since new methods are always being added. 3) Angela suggested looking at individual functional need areas by how well the overall site met the needs of people in that functional need area. She is going to look at it in more detail. == Minutes == https://www.w3.org/2019/10/15-silver-conf-minutes.html
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2019 00:55:58 UTC