- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:00:40 +0000
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D8681BEA-75F0-47E2-AE90-1E8474B0865A@nomensa.com>
Hi everyone, I think this is a useful thread to be aware of when thinking about conformance and how different methods might be set at different levels: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/782 It is about multimedia access, so the 1.2.x section in WCAG 2.x. You might think that it is fairly straightforward as the solutions are fairly cut & dried (captions, transcripts, AD etc.) However, the tricky bit is at what level you require different solutions. If you had a guideline such as “A user does not need to see in order to understand visual multimedia content”, then Patrick’s levelling in one of the comments<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/782#issuecomment-504038948> makes sense: * Bronze: EITHER provide AD or transcript * Silver: provide AD and transcript * Gold: Provide live transcript or live AD. I raise this as if you read the thread, you’ll see how the levels impacted the drafting of the guidelines, and I think we’ll have a similar (or more complex?) dynamic for the scoring in Silver, and how methods are drafted. Kind regards, -Alastair -- www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/> / @alastc
Received on Friday, 21 June 2019 16:01:06 UTC