W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > July 2019

Re: thoughts points system for silver

From: Frederick Boland <frederickboland@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:17:56 -0400
Cc: "lw@tetralogical.com" <lw@tetralogical.com>, "Hall, Charles (DET-MRM)" <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>, Chris Loiselle <loiselles@me.com>, Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Message-Id: <BA88853B-D9DF-46BB-90A1-FD5EE8498C26@yahoo.com>
To: Jennifer Chadwick <jcha@siteimprove.com>
+1

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 18, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Jennifer Chadwick <jcha@siteimprove.com> wrote:
> 
> As a UX person, I also agree with Charles and Léonie.  I prefer the focus to be on the end user experience and outcome of testing. 
> 
> 
>  
> Jennifer Chadwick
> Lead Accessibility Strategist and Product Expert, North America
>  
> 
>  
> 110 Yonge Street, Suite 700   |   Toronto, Ontario M5C 1T4
> Direct +1 647 952 0364  |  jcha@siteimprove.com
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Click here to opt out of receiving emails.
> Cliquez ici pour vous désabonner/désinscrire.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Léonie Watson <lw@tetralogical.com> 
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 11:57 AM
> To: Hall, Charles (DET-MRM) <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>; Chris Loiselle <loiselles@me.com>; Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: thoughts points system for silver
> 
> 
>> On 18/07/2019 16:33, Hall, Charles (DET-MRM) wrote:
>> My opinion (and I say this as a UX person) is that testing itself is 
>> the wrong emphasis. What the guideline should encourage is outcomes...  
>>> I also have a pretty strong opinion that the level of effort of the 
>> author / creator is both immeasurable and moot.
> 
> 
> I agree on both counts.
> 
> Do you have any thoughts on how we might gauge the outcomes?
> 
> 
> Léonie.
> 
>> 
>> *Charles Hall* // Senior UX Architect
>> 
>> (he//him)
>> 
>> charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com
>> <mailto:charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com?subject=Note%20From%20Signature>
>> 
>> w 248.203.8723
>> 
>> m 248.225.8179
>> 
>> 360 W Maple Ave, Birmingham MI 48009
>> 
>> mrm-mccann.com 
>> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww
>> .mrm-mccann.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cjcha%40siteimprove.com%7C91cf4b2
>> d19e14fce3dd708d70b98c6e7%7Cad30e5bc301d40dba10a0e8d40abe0f9%7C1%7C0%7
>> C636990623113473298&amp;sdata=7%2Bqwitgc7zdNzhqGHrglGJLi%2FdSJNNtZ41ZR
>> XOTrJrE%3D&amp;reserved=0>
>> 
>> MRM//McCann
>> 
>> Relationship Is Our Middle Name
>> 
>> Network of the Year, Cannes Lions 2019
>> 
>> Ad Age Agency A-List 2016, 2017, 2019
>> 
>> Ad Age Creativity Innovators 2016, 2017
>> 
>> Ad Age B-to-B Agency of the Year 2018
>> 
>> North American Agency of the Year, Cannes 2016
>> 
>> Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant 2017, 2018, 2019
>> 
>> Most Creatively Effective Agency Network in the World, Effie 2018, 
>> 2019
>> 
>> *From: *Chris Loiselle <loiselles@me.com>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, July 16, 2019 at 10:05 AM
>> *To: *Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
>> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] thoughts points system for silver
>> *Resent-From: *Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
>> *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, July 16, 2019 at 10:04 AM
>> 
>> Hi Silver,
>> 
>> Just a thought off of today's call:
>> 
>> In regard to point system, would the fact that user testing was 
>> completed at a given organization during the development of a product 
>> give them extra points vs. not completing user testing at all?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> For each demographic of user testing, grading all user tests equally, 
>> would someone who tests with a user that has limited sight and a user 
>> that is hard of hearing not receive as many points as someone that 
>> tests with someone who is Blind, someone who has low vision, someone 
>> who is Deaf,  someone who is hard of hearing, someone with a cognitive 
>> disability (etc.)?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> What if the organization went deep on depth of testing with the user 
>> who is Blind and the user who has limited sight, but only went surface 
>> level
>> (breadth) with multiple users each with a different disabilities vs. 
>> diving deep with two users ? Would those be weighted differently? The 
>> same? I know there was discussion on ribbons, points, badges, where 
>> would that come into play?
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Chris Loiselle
>> 
>> This message contains information which may be confidential and 
>> privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to 
>> receive this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, 
>> copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information 
>> contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, 
>> please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message. 
>> Thank you very much.
> 
> --
> @TetraLogical TetraLogical.com
> 
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2019 17:18:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:46 UTC