W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > July 2019

Re: thoughts points system for silver

From: Léonie Watson <lw@tetralogical.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:57:24 +0100
To: "Hall, Charles (DET-MRM)" <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>, Chris Loiselle <loiselles@me.com>, Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Message-ID: <b4437dd1-3354-f140-434f-63a17a708f08@tetralogical.com>

On 18/07/2019 16:33, Hall, Charles (DET-MRM) wrote:
> My opinion (and I say this as a UX person) is that testing itself is the 
> wrong emphasis. What the guideline should encourage is outcomes...  > I also have a
> pretty strong opinion that the level of effort of the author / creator 
> is both immeasurable and moot. 


I agree on both counts.

Do you have any thoughts on how we might gauge the outcomes?


Léonie.

> 
> *Charles Hall* // Senior UX Architect
> 
> (he//him)
> 
> charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com 
> <mailto:charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com?subject=Note%20From%20Signature>
> 
> w 248.203.8723
> 
> m 248.225.8179
> 
> 360 W Maple Ave, Birmingham MI 48009
> 
> mrm-mccann.com <https://www.mrm-mccann.com/>
> 
> MRM//McCann
> 
> Relationship Is Our Middle Name
> 
> Network of the Year, Cannes Lions 2019
> 
> Ad Age Agency A-List 2016, 2017, 2019
> 
> Ad Age Creativity Innovators 2016, 2017
> 
> Ad Age B-to-B Agency of the Year 2018
> 
> North American Agency of the Year, Cannes 2016
> 
> Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant 2017, 2018, 2019
> 
> Most Creatively Effective Agency Network in the World, Effie 2018, 2019
> 
> *From: *Chris Loiselle <loiselles@me.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, July 16, 2019 at 10:05 AM
> *To: *Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] thoughts points system for silver
> *Resent-From: *Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, July 16, 2019 at 10:04 AM
> 
> Hi Silver,
> 
> Just a thought off of today's call:
> 
> In regard to point system, would the fact that user testing was 
> completed at a given organization during the development of a product 
> give them extra points vs. not completing user testing at all?
> 
> 
> 
> For each demographic of user testing, grading all user tests equally, 
> would someone who tests with a user that has limited sight and a user 
> that is hard of hearing not receive as many points as someone that tests 
> with someone who is Blind, someone who has low vision, someone who is 
> Deaf,  someone who is hard of hearing, someone with a cognitive 
> disability (etc.)?
> 
> 
> 
> What if the organization went deep on depth of testing with the user who 
> is Blind and the user who has limited sight, but only went surface level 
> (breadth) with multiple users each with a different disabilities vs. 
> diving deep with two users ? Would those be weighted differently? The 
> same? I know there was discussion on ribbons, points, badges, where 
> would that come into play?
> 
> Thank you,
> Chris Loiselle
> 
> This message contains information which may be confidential and 
> privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to 
> receive this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, 
> disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information 
> contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, 
> please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message. Thank 
> you very much.

-- 
@TetraLogical TetraLogical.com
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2019 15:57:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:24:01 UTC