- From: Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 11:59:39 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGQw2hmdkeLAVhPiXr7S6DMKywQnHX3CLpnEr5sf=0YDPrUhYA@mail.gmail.com>
> > I would have thought that a in a conformance statement you would need to > specify which methods you are relying on, and those could include > user-agent end methods. Yep! But conformance as we've discussed it so far doesn't mandate that you need to use the methods outlined by Silver as recommended for meeting a guideline, so you can create your own methods to do so. Silver would, however, recommend methods (as available) to meet a guideline. -Shawn On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:40 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > > Identify Input Purpose > <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#identify-input-purpose> doesn't include > anything about user need, only requiring that "The purpose of each input > field collecting information about the user *can be programmatically > determined*…" > > Indeed, it would be quite a big change going from content-based > requirement to user-need based requirements. > > [emphasis mine], which opens up the ability for developers to meet the > guidance by using a method where we don't have a list of assistive tech > making use of it. > > In a WCAG 2.x context that SC wouldn’t have been included if there was no > assistive tech available, but in Silver I wouldn’t (necessarily) assume > that would be the same? > > If you lead with a user-requirement as the ‘guideline’, then it’s easier > to show gaps. > > E.g. “User does not have to remember personal information when filling in > forms”, has methods including browser-tools and autocomplete. You get an > interesting set of levels because: > > - A browser can fill in some fields without ‘autocomplete’ included > because it has heuristics, but those can be thrown off by the content (e.g. > random label names). > - The browser tools are more reliable with autocomplete, and that’s > the authors responsibility. > > > > > what level of support would "graduate" a method to recommended for > meeting a guideline and how we might do so in the most effective way. > > I would have thought that a in a conformance statement you would need to > specify which methods you are relying on, and those could include > user-agent end methods. > > Perhaps also specify some at the different levels, e.g. bronze for relying > on browser heuristic, silver for also using autocomplete. > > Cheers, > > -Alastair >
Received on Monday, 4 February 2019 17:00:14 UTC