Re: Requirements survey tasks from AG WG call

I updated the Requirements doc with the editorial changes requested by 
AGWG:

situational -> recurring (David Mc Donald)
Explanation of calling out low vision and cognitive (Marc Johlic)
Fixed Typos (Thanks, Mike Gower!)
Move DP10 -> DP6.  Numbering changes. (AWK)
are available -> can be used (Laura Carlson)

The remaining items will take more discussion, which we will do on 
Friday.  If anyone can draft proposals to address these items before 
Friday, that will save time.

jeanne

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:  Re: Requirements survey tasks from AG WG call
Date:  Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:49:13 -0400
From:  Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
To:  public-silver@w3.org



*Additional Changes Requested to Requirements*

 1. "Change Multiple Ways to Display" to "Multiple Ways to Present"
 2. Add a new requirement that we will support different types of
    organizations (see Alastair's comment)
 3. Add a new requirement around Accessibility Supported defining what
    the author's responsibility is.  Alastair did say he was willing to
    wait for that one until a later version of Requirements, but others
    asked for it.

On 4/23/2019 12:45 PM, Shawn Lauriat wrote:
> *Design Principles*
>
>  1. Fix typos and grammar things pointed out in the survey results.
>  2. Clarify language around research?
>  3. Move the Automation one from Process into Guidelines.
>
> *Requirements*
>
>  1. Intro: "Disabilities can be permanent, temporary, or situational
>     limitations." episodic? different kinds of temporary?
>  2. Technology Neutral wording bakes-in guidelines vs. methods, see if
>     we can improve that.
>
> I then had to leave the call as the group continued on, so hoping 
> someone else noted any other tasks that came from the discussion!
>
> -Shawn