W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > April 2019

RE: Proposal for new version of Requirement 3.7 Motivtion

From: Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <24ac3ae9-7f3f-4a7e-9ce5-88621ef0e550@default>
To: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>, Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Here's an edited version:

The Guidelines motivate organizations to go beyond minimal accessibility requirements by providing a scoring system that rewards organizations which demonstrate a greater effort to improve accessibility.  For example, Methods that go beyond the minimum (such as: Methods for Guidelines that are not included in WCAG 2.x A or AA, task-completion evaluations, or testing with users with disabilities) are worth more points in the scoring system.

I change "...that rewards organizations that..." because I'm trying to avoid a sequence of "that's".  I also changed "evalations" to "evaluations", because I think that's the intended word.

Regards,
Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com> 
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 12:42 PM
To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Subject: Proposal for new version of Requirement 3.7 Motivtion

Here is the proposal for revision of Requirement 3.7 Motivation as requested by AGWG to make it measureable.

Motivation

The Guidelines motivate organizations to go beyond minimal accessibility requirements by providing a scoring system that rewards organizations that demonstrate a greater effort to improve accessibility.  For example, Methods that go beyond the minimum (such as: Methods for Guidelines that are not included in WCAG 2.x A or AA, task-completion evalations, or testing with users with disabilities) are worth more points in the scoring system.
Received on Monday, 8 April 2019 19:05:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:23:58 UTC