- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 12:10:19 -0500
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <ef28181e-811e-8536-9f43-fe60bb493658@spellmanconsulting.com>
Note: The text version of the minutes has the correct attendance.
Formatted version of the minutes
https://www.w3.org/2018/03/02-silver-minutes.html
Text version has been edited to add the people present.
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Silver Task Force Teleconference
02 Mar 2018
Attendees
Present
JaEunJemmkuj, Jan, Jeanne, Jennison Charles, Imelda, JohnM, Kelsey, Shari, Shawn
Regrets
Chair
jeanne, shawn
Scribe
JohnM
Contents
* [2]Topics
1. [3]review status of research, assign any items needing
completion
2. [4]review Summary slide deck
3. [5]email to participants
4. [6]Thanks to all who pushed so hard to get the
research done
* [7]Summary of Action Items
* [8]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<jeanne> Research Summary doc <-
[9]https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1POs7orJ4ALB0bq5_vyo4
v8RxDcr-5ctwD1noVgpXuJc/edit?usp=sharing
[9] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1POs7orJ4ALB0bq5_vyo4v8RxDcr-5ctwD1noVgpXuJc/edit?usp=sharing
review status of research, assign any items needing completion
Jeanne: The Job Stories are complete, and we are waiting for
final publish. I will put it on community group as a draft, and
move to final status later.
... Problem Statements are also complete.
Shari: I have uploaded the Summaries into the Google Drive.
... The Internet of Things is good, and the research is good.
Jeanne: Next action is to add it to the summary. I think I can
do that.
... The Mike Crabbe papers - we'll need to tie up some loose
ends there.
... The Eleanor Acanoa (sp?) paper is done, that needs to be
published.
<jeanne> Research Status Overview <-
[10]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ropTpocIdthjnkaGILj
ZRPrerAFGDNGXVstSOny45Zo/edit?usp=sharing
[10] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ropTpocIdthjnkaGILjZRPrerAFGDNGXVstSOny45Zo/edit?usp=sharing
Jeanne: [Eleanor Lioacono]
... The Usability survey - the conclusions for the summary are
sort of done.
<jeanne> Summary Report Slide Deck <-
[11]https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1POs7orJ4ALB0bq5_vyo
4v8RxDcr-5ctwD1noVgpXuJc/edit?usp=sharing
[11] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1POs7orJ4ALB0bq5_vyo4v8RxDcr-5ctwD1noVgpXuJc/edit?usp=sharing
Jeanne: Slide 18 - Dave was able to pull from a usability
study.
Shawn: People will wonder what makes these SC usable vs
unusable.
... The ones marked most usable all have simpler rules.
Concrete and easy to understand.
... Some of the others are more about prevention, and cover
more ground.
... Even if we don't have stats on why some are more usable, we
can still do analysis on differences between the two (columns).
... This is helpful, it can inform further research on our part
after the design sprint. We can keep it in mind during the
design sprint.
Jeanne: The international translations probably won't make the
design sprint.
<Charles> key findings:
[12]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iOut3_i1JBQu5_16plZ8u7x
Cd66T4TbW2zPR1KmWWF4/edit?usp=sharing
[12] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iOut3_i1JBQu5_16plZ8u7xCd66T4TbW2zPR1KmWWF4/edit?usp=sharing
Kelsey: The WCAG Conformance Survey Key Findings - we had 49
participants, and 8 declined to report on demographic
questions.
... We've been organizing the data from the most common
answers.
... We made brief claims based on the research findings, we'll
probably expand on that in the conclusions.
... It's not complete yet.
Charles: I'll work on fleshing out the conclusions and key
opportunities over this weekend.
Jeanne: It would be great if we could send it out for Monday.
Charles: The sample size is small, but the Roles is
significant.
... My expectation is that this needs to be closer to an
academic paper, for a research summary.
... I'd like the introductory part to say that it's
statistically significant, based on the types of people who
participated.
Jeanne: I'll contact Sarah Horton about the stats part.
Jennison: I think our sample is a convenient sample, so it's as
significant as we could get.
Shari: These are not empirical research studies. The professors
used students who were available. But it does have some
relevance / significance.
Imelda: With a smaller sample size, it limits what can be put
into an academic format.
Kelsey: 25 of the people who took the survey have
"accessibility" in their job title. Several of the other roles
were technical.
Charles: I'll work on the key opportunities over the weekend.
Jeanne: We'll finish the legacy interviews this week.
<Charles> reminder, I have to drop off the call @10:25
Jeanne: Jan and I just need to polish up the document.
<Kelsey> Here's the draft:
[13]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zrzm9i9AsNo4_0qZY7GXrYY
Zy1o399kg_92Lc3wDSdc/edit#
[13] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zrzm9i9AsNo4_0qZY7GXrYYZy1o399kg_92Lc3wDSdc/edit
Jeanne: The Conference feedback draft doc is almost done, just
needs polishing.
... The Literature Review is being reviewed, we'll have it
shortly.
... We'll make it a priority next week.
review Summary slide deck
<jeanne>
[14]https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1POs7orJ4ALB0bq5_vyo
4v8RxDcr-5ctwD1noVgpXuJc/edit?usp=sharing
[14] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1POs7orJ4ALB0bq5_vyo4v8RxDcr-5ctwD1noVgpXuJc/edit?usp=sharing
Shawn: We should also share these slides as HTML and PDF, and
share links to all 3.
Jeanne: Shawn, can you work on drafting the email to the
participants?
Shawn: This afternoon I can.
... Can we make sure all the participants are in the
spreadsheet? Because there were some late additions.
Jeanne: Shawn: That was the link for the Silver Design Sprint
Agenda.
Jennison: We need to talk about the CSUN presentation - maybe
next week - we can leverage pieces of the slide deck.
email to participants
Thanks to all who pushed so hard to get the research done
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
Received on Saturday, 3 March 2018 17:10:47 UTC