Minutes of the Silver meeting of 26 June 2018

Formatted minutes:
https://www.w3.org/2018/06/26-silver-minutes.html


Text of minutes:

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

                  Silver Task Force and Community Group

26 Jun 2018

Attendees

    Present
           KimD, jeanne, Jennison, AngelaAccessForAll, Roy,
           mikeCrabb, kirkwood

    Regrets
           Peter

    Chair
           jeanne

    Scribe
           jeanne

Contents

      * [2]Topics
          1. [3]TPAC registration early bird ends July 31 (repeat)
          2. [4]Reminder: no Silver meetings July 3 and 6
          3. [5]Silver Requirements
          4. [6]slide deck with prototypes for a11yTO
          5. [7]ideas for China work
      * [8]Summary of Action Items
      * [9]Summary of Resolutions
      __________________________________________________________

TPAC registration early bird ends July 31 (repeat)

    <kirkwood> hello i can hear but mic not working... argh

    [10]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2018Jun/
    0036.html

      [10] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2018Jun/0036.html

Reminder: no Silver meetings July 3 and 6

    Jeanne: happy vacation to all vacationing.

Silver Requirements

    Comments from AGWG:
    [11]https://docs.google.com/document/d/11eSnUw9iBf_07GZsna5ozj-
    -zZx6DTATguaTv8uauEo/edit#heading=h.e4f7qe4qdp34

      [11] https://docs.google.com/document/d/11eSnUw9iBf_07GZsna5ozj--zZx6DTATguaTv8uauEo/edit#heading=h.e4f7qe4qdp34

    <scribe> New draft of Requirements:
    [12]https://w3c.github.io/silver/requirements/

      [12] https://w3c.github.io/silver/requirements/

    <KimD> The 2.0 abstract does say "WCAG 2.0 success criteria are
    written as testable statements that are not
    technology-specific.

    <kirkwood> sounds fine to me

    <kirkwood> its nicer and shows depth

    <kirkwood> I like onramp

    <kirkwood> introduction is fine too

    <kirkwood> I don’t see how a standard can not be technology
    neutral

    <kirkwood> html is a standard though

    <kirkwood> so extend the standard, in essence. i see the core
    be neutral. I see what you are saying

    <kirkwood> makes sens

    <kirkwood> sens/sense

    <kirkwood> Agreed. That is what facilitates innovation.

    <kirkwood> I was just worred about how specify technolgy turns
    people away from innovation

    <mikeCrabb> MikeCrabb : I like the idea of having these
    different 'flavours' of what the silver guidelines could be.
    There would be a general 'core' version and then dependant on
    what technology a person was looking at there could be
    different options that people could enable to see specific
    advice

    <mikeCrabb> ... one of the issues with current WCAG is that
    there are Guidelines linking to Success Criteria linking to
    Techniques, so as a user you have to go quite deep in order to
    get to it. So in part, this is just another way of changing the
    view that people see

    close item 1

slide deck with prototypes for a11yTO

    [13]https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1EJN_KTXD0NaGGpNrwAf
    3i3idA-k1A0QR6Ctbk0re3nE/edit#slide=id.g3ca1179f10_0_45

      [13] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1EJN_KTXD0NaGGpNrwAf3i3idA-k1A0QR6Ctbk0re3nE/edit#slide=id.g3ca1179f10_0_45

    <mikeCrabb> jeanne: will be doing a presentation Thursday night
    at accessibility Toronto. Slide No 14 has a new section called
    prototypes

    <mikeCrabb> ... added in what is happening with plain language,
    one for IA. We are looking for 3-6 prototypes for what silver
    can look like and members are looking at existing work for
    ideas to go forward

    <mikeCrabb> ... one thing we haven't talked about is how to get
    silver to be scalable and how to get accessibility experts to
    add their own code/design patterns etc.

    <mikeCrabb> ... this is something that a lot of people got
    excited about last year, but as we're going back this is
    something that we should be talking about too

    <mikeCrabb> ...related to IA as we need to know how this can
    work and see if anyone wants to come and work on it

    <mikeCrabb> ... conformance. Only a proposal, not a decision.

    <mikeCrabb> [14]https://w3c.github.io/silver/

      [14] https://w3c.github.io/silver/

    MikeCrabb: It would be very helpful to have IA prototypes.

    Roy: I could share this with the China Accessibility Community
    Group. THen I could bring their ideas to the Silver Task Force.
    ... there are Community Groups for other countries. Use those
    to contact people who are interested in accessibility.

    Jeanne: Jemma, do you have contacts in the Korean Accessibility
    Community? Could you ask people to work on a prototype?

ideas for China work

    Jeanne: I will look for the draft of the invitation email that
    we worked on and update it.

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

    [End of minutes]
      __________________________________________________________

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2018 14:43:06 UTC