Re: agenda for Silver meeting of 14 December 2018

Reading through the documents...

> Authors are not responsible for the browser or assistive technology

If authors make their own method based hanging off a catch all method at
the end of list of methods for a guideline, I suggest they should have an
obligation to demonstrate that the work with current Assistive tech and
Browsers rather than a theoretical "it should work" basis (i.e.
aria-errormessage should work but its not supported yet). I would call this
"Ensuring new methods (not already listed in the spec) are Accessibility
Supported".

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613-806-9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:06 AM Jeanne Spellman <
jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com> wrote:

> agenda+  Point system/Levels & Conformance document
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wTJme7ZhhtzyWBxI8oMXzl7i4QHW7aDHRYTKXKELPcY/edit#heading=h.xzxmbeyrlvz7
>
> agenda+ Heuristics proposal
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lEkht-bhkaPMzOojWpDjZhbnGeckiYLh-J4-ze7cGS0/edit#heading=h.dge8hcv9s32m
>
> agenda+  Updates from other prototypes
>
> ==Conference Call info==
>
> https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_silver-fri
>
>
>