- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 10:50:00 -0400
- To: public-silver@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ff0e69e1-eed7-6a13-c8c0-4dd8df3e6487@spellmanconsulting.com>
It is definitely something to tread carefully with. Unintended consequences are the bane of conformance. The proposed Conformance levels for Silver are largely a response to the needs of the regulatory environment. I remember this came up in the legacy and conformance interviews when we asked where the WCAG structure came from (Legacy), and then when asking about Conformance, I remember several people in the legal or regulatory sphere saying that they needed at least 3 levels: low, average, and high. The regulators wanted to be able to require average that was set by a neutral authority. The lawyers wanted to be able to say to a judge where the client accessibility was on a simple scale. I think we should also be looking at a %age scale. I have heard proposals about it in the past, but no one has submitted one, and I haven't had the time to write up ideas. Some new ideas about Conformance would be welcome. jeanne > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:37 AM Hall, Charles (DET-MRM) > <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com <mailto:Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>> wrote: > > > Food for thought on the Conformance prototypes and surveys: > > If the proposed model measures conformance by a point system, > percentage, or tier or any other method that implies the level of > accessibility is anything less than complete, it may result in > escalating the current fear-based culture – at least in the U.S. > Tread cautiously with any method of conformance claim that could > be challenged out of fear. > > */Asking about compliance? You may be asking the wrong > question./*— Lainey Feingold > > http://www.lflegal.com/2018/07/ada-28/ > > *Charles Hall* // UX Architect, Technology > > charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com > <mailto:charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com?subject=Note%20From%20Signature> > > w 248.203.8723 > > m 248.225.8179 > > 360 W Maple Ave, Birmingham MI 48009 > > mrm-mccann.com <https://www.mrm-mccann.com/> > > MRM//McCann > > Relationship Is Our Middle Name > > Ad Age B-to-B Agency of the Year, 2018 > > Ad Age Agency A-List 2016, 2017 > > Ad Age Creativity Innovators 2016, 2017 > > North American Agency of the Year, Cannes 2016 > > Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant, 2017, 2018 > > This message contains information which may be confidential and > privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized > to receive this message for the intended recipient), you may not > use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any > information contained in the message. If you have received the > message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and > delete the message. Thank you very much. >
Received on Friday, 3 August 2018 14:51:06 UTC