W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > August 2018

Why Conformance levels? [was: Re: Regrets and thoughts]

From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 10:50:00 -0400
To: public-silver@w3.org
Message-ID: <ff0e69e1-eed7-6a13-c8c0-4dd8df3e6487@spellmanconsulting.com>
It is definitely something to tread carefully with.  Unintended 
consequences are the bane of conformance.

The proposed Conformance levels for Silver are largely a response to the 
needs of the regulatory environment.  I remember this came up in the 
legacy and conformance interviews when we asked where the WCAG structure 
came from (Legacy), and then when asking about Conformance, I remember 
several people in the legal or regulatory sphere saying that they needed 
at least 3 levels: low, average, and high.  The regulators wanted to be 
able to require average that was set by a neutral authority.  The 
lawyers wanted to be able to say to a judge where the client 
accessibility was on a simple scale.

I think we should also be looking at a %age scale.  I have heard 
proposals about it in the past, but no one has submitted one, and I 
haven't had the time to write up ideas.  Some new ideas about 
Conformance would be welcome.


> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:37 AM Hall, Charles (DET-MRM) 
> <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com <mailto:Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>> wrote:
>     Food for thought on the Conformance prototypes and surveys:
>     If the proposed model measures conformance by a point system,
>     percentage, or tier or any other method that implies the level of
>     accessibility is anything less than complete, it may result in
>     escalating the current fear-based culture – at least in the U.S.
>     Tread cautiously with any method of conformance claim that could
>     be challenged out of fear.
>     */Asking about compliance? You may be asking the wrong
>     question./*— Lainey Feingold
>     http://www.lflegal.com/2018/07/ada-28/
>     *Charles Hall* // UX Architect, Technology
>     charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com
>     <mailto:charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com?subject=Note%20From%20Signature>
>     w 248.203.8723
>     m 248.225.8179
>     360 W Maple Ave, Birmingham MI 48009
>     mrm-mccann.com <https://www.mrm-mccann.com/>
>     MRM//McCann
>     Relationship Is Our Middle Name
>     Ad Age B-to-B Agency of the Year, 2018
>     Ad Age Agency A-List 2016, 2017
>     Ad Age Creativity Innovators 2016, 2017
>     North American Agency of the Year, Cannes 2016
>     Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant, 2017, 2018
>     This message contains information which may be confidential and
>     privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized
>     to receive this message for the intended recipient), you may not
>     use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any
>     information contained in the message.  If you have received the
>     message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and
>     delete the message.  Thank you very much.
Received on Friday, 3 August 2018 14:51:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:43 UTC