- From: Hall, Charles (DET-MRM) <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 16:28:57 +0000
- To: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>, Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <78BF5D45-1842-44E6-8860-451C5E7A51F3@mrm-mccann.com>
Apologies. I was unaware of this meeting. When I saw the “regrets” thread earlier, I assumed it was referring to the recurring Tuesday meeting at 9:30a EST via WebEx – which is the only meeting I am aware of. If there are other meetings or events, where can I locate the details? Thanks, Charles Hall UX Architect, Technology t / 248.203.8723 m / 248.225.8179 e / charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com skype / charles.h.all 360 W Maple, Birmingham MI 48009 w / www.mrm-mccann.com [cid:image001.png@01D3549F.51C080E0] Creativity. Technology. Performance. From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com> on behalf of Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com> Date: Friday, November 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org> Subject: Minutes of Silver TF teleconference of 3 November 2017 Resent-From: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org> Resent-Date: Friday, November 3, 2017 at 11:08 AM Formatted minutes of meeting: https://www.w3.org/2017/11/03-silver-minutes.html Text of minutes: [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ Silver Task Force Teleconference 03 Nov 2017 Attendees Present MichaelC, JanMcSorley, Jemma, jeanne, Josie, Michael, Jennison Regrets Shawn, Sharri Chair jeanne Scribe Jan Contents * [2]Topics 1. [3]NcNally Survey Analysis 2. [4]Tyson survey questions 3. [5]Pete McNally Survey Analysis * [6]Summary of Action Items * [7]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ NcNally Survey Analysis Tyson survey questions [8]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kWK-AJ1MTw9jnh8emitgOauw 9tfH4EUAzx-rs9rxcxo/edit#heading=h.qv64wjyega4y [8] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kWK-AJ1MTw9jnh8emitgOauw9tfH4EUAzx-rs9rxcxo/edit#heading=h.qv64wjyega4y <jeanne> jeanne: The questions are directly from our research questions and seem like the language is too technical for a survey. I doubt that teachers would want to answer it. <jeanne> Ryan: They should make it more personal. Like "what tools do you use to evaluate accessibility?" <jeanne> Jan: I think most teachers will not know who the W3C is. I think Tyson is targeting Computer Science majors and teachers, but I think it would be helpful to get answers from students with disabilities. <jeanne> ... please comment on the document. I'll meet with him at 10:00AM. [9]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kWK-AJ1MTw9jnh8emitgOauw 9tfH4EUAzx-rs9rxcxo/edit#heading=h.qv64wjyega4y [9] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kWK-AJ1MTw9jnh8emitgOauw9tfH4EUAzx-rs9rxcxo/edit#heading=h.qv64wjyega4y Pete McNally Survey Analysis <jeanne> [10]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s__XoEMsuUpsmE48GTE3nUN _ERL9UmXfPR_UoCPYxlY/edit?userstoinvite=christopher.loiselle@pe rkins.org&ts=59fba970&actionButton=1#heading=h.q6e5fx7mb3iw [10] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s__XoEMsuUpsmE48GTE3nUN_ERL9UmXfPR_UoCPYxlY/edit?userstoinvite=christopher.loiselle@perkins.org&ts=59fba970&actionButton=1#heading=h.q6e5fx7mb3iw We need to look at this document, agree on the conclusions and then create some slides for TPAC and then once we have agreed on everything, we will make this document public <jeanne> TPAC slide deck <- [11]https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1eqUPEPxIH8AJZ8aVY3- vwGMH0sdrXhMG_JCQTp9PSy8/edit#slide=id.g29970d1a13_0_5 [11] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1eqUPEPxIH8AJZ8aVY3-vwGMH0sdrXhMG_JCQTp9PSy8/edit#slide=id.g29970d1a13_0_5 [12]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kWK-AJ1MTw9jnh8emitgOau w9tfH4EUAzx-rs9rxcxo/edit#heading=h.qv64wjyega4y - Tyson McMillan research questions [12] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kWK-AJ1MTw9jnh8emitgOauw9tfH4EUAzx-rs9rxcxo/edit#heading=h.qv64wjyega4y Jeanne: We need feedback on the Pete McNally Report [13]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s__XoEMsuUpsmE48GTE3nUN _ERL9UmXfPR_UoCPYxlY/edit?userstoinvite=christopher.loiselle@pe rkins.org&ts=59fba970&actionButton=1#heading=h.q6e5fx7mb3iw [13] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s__XoEMsuUpsmE48GTE3nUN_ERL9UmXfPR_UoCPYxlY/edit?userstoinvite=christopher.loiselle@perkins.org&ts=59fba970&actionButton=1#heading=h.q6e5fx7mb3iw Jeanne: Under platform focus - Silver has to pursue being hardware agnostic - need to look at the wording of this and massage it. ... look at the comment about some people working in environments where accessibility is not valued - do you agree or disagree? ... look at "what aspects are difficult to apply" <jemma> question was " How important is accessibility to your company/clients in creating an excellent user/customer experience? " Ryan: It's important to note in the report that these are the opinions of UX professionals surveyed. How can the W3C create good standards and work with other organizations to create educational resources? Jeanne: The W3C should look into how it can be a place that points people to the resources they need- if they need an example of an accessible carousel, then they could find links to some potential resources. ... Familiarity and Usefulness section is next ... we just have data to share here - not necessarily a conclusion Jemma: This implies that WCAG has authority, but not practicality Jeanne: Let's look at aspects that are "difficult to apply" Ryan: Mastery is an emotional issue. If people don't feel like they can master something, despite their best efforts, they can become angry. ... The concept of personal mastery is an emotional issue. If there is no sense of mastery, then there will be no emotional buy-in. Jemma: This might be a great topic for our interview research. ... We can be successful to certain degree, but if people experience barriers to mastery, they may determine accessibility cannot be achieved. Jeanne: We will not have meetings next week because too many people will be at TPAC ... Jan and Jeanne will work on this on Sunday to bring it to a presentable level ... if everyong could please make comments and help us with conclusions, then we can polish it off ... next meeting is on November 14th Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message. Thank you very much.
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
Received on Friday, 3 November 2017 16:30:58 UTC