- From: McSorley, Jan <jan.mcsorley@pearson.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:13:05 -0500
- To: Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
- Cc: Shari Butler <shari.butler@pearson.com>
- Message-ID: <CAFuJ5sNitX1S4uux9sbOC8sABWwJ-Hj0GrA79Q-YKJxpKxW5Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Everyone, I just wanted to start a dialog about how best to manage our stakeholder list with researchers. Sarah shared a link in today's meeting that we can share with stakeholders <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/128vPnCweXN9t4JBG7-AOeBhT-KquaWXcCsi3H-f8u94/edit#gid=0>. While this shows the general categories of stakeholders, I believe that we still have some work to do before sharing stakeholder contacts with our researchers. Here are my thoughts: 1. We need to complete a survey of stakeholders to find out who wants to be involved in certain research tasks and we need to articulate stakeholder expectations to those involved in research activities. 2. We need to complete our researcher expectations for how to interact with stakeholders and then determine how to give them access to the stakeholders they are most interested in engaging. 3. We need to determine what, if any parameters, we are going to put in place for researchers who have access to stakeholder groups that are not a part of our current list, but who may fall within an established stakeholder category. For example, Scott Hollier has access to several hundred alumni across the world who have completed the web accessibility online course and certificate offered by his university in Australia. These alumni are working as developers / web professionals in various industries. How do we protect and/or vet this group and what are Silver's expectations for how information will be shared from research conducted with this group? 4. Has the Silver Task Force prioritized which research questions are important to answer first? For example, have we thought about which research questions are most important for the 1st phase of research that is intended to feed into the development of prototypes? Of not, is this something that we could do during one of our meetings and perhaps add a prioritization score to the research questions listed on the wiki page? Thanks in advance for your thoughts and guidance. Best to you, Jan McSorley VP, Accessibility Psychometrics and Testing Services 400 Center Ridge Drive, Suite E Austin, TX 78753 M - (512) 673-9569 Twitter: @Jan_McSorley Skype: jan.mcsorley www.linkedin.com/in/janmcsorley Learn more at pearson.com [image: Pearson] *We put a man on the moon in the 1960's ... surely we can make information technology fully accessible to people with disabilities. It can be done ... it must be done ... it will be done!*
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 16:14:17 UTC