Re: Need review today: Please review Silver acknowledgements

Excellent! Thank you for checking.

-Shawn

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 1:46 PM Rachael Bradley Montgomery <
rachael@accessiblecommunity.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We reached out and confirmed that Cybele wanted to be included in the
> acknowledgements.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rachael
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 1:27 PM Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com> wrote:
>
>> If I remember correctly, Cybele did not want her name directly connected
>> to this work. Do we have a way to credit maybe by the IRC handle used
>> instead to thank without that connection?
>>
>> -Shawn
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Jeanne Spellman <
>> jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Add to D.1 Participants of the Silver Task Force and Community Group...
>>>
>>> Omar Bonilla
>>>
>>> Joe Cronin
>>>
>>> Mary Jo Mueller
>>>
>>> Sheri Byrne-Haber
>>>
>>> Lucy Greco
>>>
>>> Christy Owens
>>>
>>> Kimberly Patch
>>>
>>> Christian Perera
>>>
>>> Abi Roper
>>>
>>> Karen Schriver
>>>
>>> Stein Erik Skotkjerra
>>>
>>> David Swallow
>>>
>>> Suzanne Taylor
>>>
>>> Please keep the Research Partners as from D.3 of Requirements (it's what
>>> you have in the branch).
>>>
>>> On 10/27/2020 2:10 PM, Michael Cooper wrote:
>>> >
>>> > BTW, lists of participants that you might want to check for missing
>>> > names that you know of:
>>> >
>>> > Silver CG: https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/silver/participants
>>> >
>>> > Silver TF: https://www.w3.org/groups/tf/silver-tf
>>> >
>>> > AG WG: https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/ag/participants
>>> >
>>> > Michael
>>> >
>>> > On 27/10/2020 1:59 p.m., Michael Cooper wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> It turns out we (I) overlooked putting the acknowledgements section
>>> >> into the WCAG 3 draft. I've taken a stab:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/acknowledgements/guidelines/index.html#acknowledgements
>>> >>
>>> >> I used my judgement about people who have contributed, but almost
>>> >> certainly missed people. Please let me know whom to add.
>>> >>
>>> >> I combined Silver CG and Silver TF because they operate as a unit.
>>> >> Normally I include company names alongside the individual, but things
>>> >> were all over the map and I couldn't get something consistent, so I
>>> >> just omitted that.
>>> >>
>>> >> I drew in part from an early draft:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> https://github.com/w3c/silver/blob/8809343c30a291bdac05d67a419fc65c0c785af3/edDraft/index.html
>>> >>
>>> >> From that, I also pulled in the "research partners" list. I didn't
>>> >> include the Design Sprint because I don't think that rises to the
>>> >> level of a spec acknowledgement - though perhaps those names should
>>> >> be credited as CG participants. I'm not sure either about the
>>> >> research partners, whether it rises to the level of belonging there,
>>> >> I'd like input on that.
>>> >>
>>> >> Michael
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Rachael Montgomery, PhD
> Director, Accessible Community
> rachael@accessiblecommunity.org
>
> "I will paint this day with laughter;
> I will frame this night in song."
>  - Og Mandino
>
>