- From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:10:24 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: Daniel Fernández Álvarez <danifdezalvarez@gmail.com>, "public-shex@w3.org" <public-shex@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:03:12PM +0100, Eric Prudhommeaux wrote: > > The process does seem like a sort of "inference", but the > > term is so heavily loaded in common usage towards > > _semantic_ inference in the RDF and OWL sense that it > > might be best to explicitly draw attention to how you are > > using the term differently. > > It's true that the term is heavily loaded, but I wonder if saying > "shape inference" over and over again will cause folks will figure out > that the phrase means "inference of shapes" (vs. some sort of > inference entailed by shapes). If we can get past our reflexive > interpretations, "shape inference" does seem a nice description of it. Sure, I could live with that - as long as the difference to semantic inference were discussed somewhere. Tom -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2019 12:10:54 UTC