W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-shex-dev@w3.org > November 2017

Re: [spec] Why not use ShExC for the readable spec?

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 07:35:52 +0000
To: public-shex-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-346924557-1511595349-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
(Apologies for taking so long to mention this but...) the [ShEx spec](http://shex.io/shex-semantics-20170713/#shapes-schema) includes buttons to switch between ShExJ and ShExC. The definitions are still in terms of the ShExJ because they rely on the specificity of e.g. `EachOf([TE1, TE2])` vs. something that would include parsing a la `{ TE1 ; TE2 }`.

GitHub Notification of comment by ericprud
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/shexSpec/spec/issues/11#issuecomment-346924557 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 25 November 2017 07:35:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:23:26 UTC