- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:02:04 +0000
- To: public-shacl@w3.org
Received on Monday, 27 October 2025 13:02:28 UTC
"best practices" might be better as a Note or on a wiki. Something
easier to update - including removing advice, of changing it in
non-compatible ways.
"Profiling" is on the track to be a standard (REC) - it gets frozen at
the point of publication.
Andy
On 27/10/2025 08:02, Nicholas Car wrote:
> Re-request to review Packaging recommendations
* @nicholascar: updated request to review Packaging recommendations
o https://raw.githack.com/w3c/data-shapes/shacl-packaging/shacl12-profiling/index.html#packaging
o I have removed the tricky Named Graph / quads references
o I am interested in what other recommendations we would all make
to SHACL users for how else they might package SHACL, not just
for Profiling tasks but for any other purposes. I do think it
sensible to convey what we think is Best Practice
Received on Monday, 27 October 2025 13:02:28 UTC