- From: Vladimir Alexiev via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 17:32:42 +0000
- To: public-shacl@w3.org
VladimirAlexiev has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes: == tests should be deployed at a defined location and define BASE == All manifests in https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/tree/gh-pages/shacl12-test-suite/tests and subfolders look like this: ```ttl <> a mf:Manifest ; mf:include <core/manifest.ttl> ; mf:include <sparql/manifest.ttl> ; . ``` Individual tests look like this, eg https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/blob/gh-pages/shacl12-test-suite/tests/core/complex/personexample.ttl#L58 ```ttl <personexample> rdf:type sht:Validate ; mf:action [sht:dataGraph <> ; sht:shapesGraph <>]. <> rdf:type mf:Manifest ; mf:entries (<personexample>) . ``` `<>` and `<personexample>` depend on the location of each of these files. This should work ok for a test runner since it will use the local file folder where the tests are found. It is useful for test authors to: - leverage the folder hierarchy and not have to keep URLs in sync with any reorganizations - be able to just write `sht:dataGraph <> ; sht:shapesGraph <> ;` in many of the test files (which means "data and shapes for this test are in THIS file") However, this means that individual tests don't have defined URLs. https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-test-suite/ does not define the root location where the tests will be deployed, but individual tests are listed as https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/blob/gh-pages/data-shapes-test-suite/tests/core/complex/personexample.ttl. - That URL returns a web page - the new location that returns a turtle file is https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/raw/refs/heads/gh-pages/shacl12-test-suite/tests/core/complex/personexample.ttl - But the actual test (`sht:Validate`) uses a different semantic URL: it doesn't have `.ttl` at the end Why well-defined semantic URLs for individual tests are important? Because: - We would want to tie them up to SHACL spec clauses. See [Linked Specifications, Test Suites, and Implementation Reports](https://csarven.ca/linked-specifications-reports) about this idea - We may need to tie them up to SHACL's own profiles - We want conformance reports (EARL) to refer to well-defined tests URLs. I have not seen SHACL 1.0 EARL reports; if they used the same test runner then hopefully they reported against the same test URLs. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/issues/269 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 23 February 2025 17:32:44 UTC