Re: Service or repository of SHACL rules available? (like LOV or prefix.cc)

Hi Konrad!

I tried to register SHACL shapes for RDF Data Cube and put this in "SHACL file link(s)"
https://github.com/w3c/shacl/blob/master/shapes/datacube.shapes.ttl, https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/validator/datacube.shapes.ttl
and got this error: "SHACL files list contains invalid entry (not an URI): https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/validator/datacube.shapes.ttl"

The example of this field shows two URLs and both are valid URLs, so not sure what's the problem.
Then I removed the second URL and the form passed validation, but got "Internal Server Error.
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request."

> srekl:ShapeInfo

Hmmm, is this really necessary?

TQ's has set an example for using owl:Ontology to "package" shapes, e.g. see https://github.com/w3c/shacl/blob/master/shapes/datacube.shapes.ttl.
It also uses the standard owl:imports mechanism to bring in dependencies (e.g. RDFS subclasses or function/shape libraries).
However, I think that also an rdfs:isDefinedBy link should be added to every shape, pointing back to the ontology.

Cheers!

Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2017 07:48:53 UTC