- From: Pavel Velikhov <pavel.velikhov@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:57:17 +0300
- To: "J. Fernando Sánchez" <jfernando@dit.upm.es>
- Cc: "public-sentiment@w3.org" <public-sentiment@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <2DF90B4A-B532-47CD-9834-38F7AA13374C@gmail.com>
Hi, What Google doc should we add contributions to? Best regards, Pavel Velikhov > On 06 Jul 2015, at 14:48, J. Fernando Sánchez <jfernando@dit.upm.es> wrote: > > Dear all, > > This is a kind reminder of our meeting tomorrow at 13.00 CEST. > > Please, remember to add your contributions to the google doc throughout the day. > > Regards. > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:35 PM, J. Fernando Sánchez <jfernando@dit.upm.es <mailto:jfernando@dit.upm.es>> wrote: > Dear all, > > You can find the minutes of the meeting here: https://www.w3.org/community/sentiment/wiki/Meetings <https://www.w3.org/community/sentiment/wiki/Meetings> > > To those of you who joined: thank you. Feel free to add anything I might have missed and remove anything that should not be public. > > The summary is that we need a better review the state of the art for a comprehensive survey. We defined some action points, which we will check in our next meeting on 7th July, 13.00 CEST. > > @Pavel, welcome to the community group!. I believe aspect-based sentiment analysis is an important use case for us, and it is also in our interest to have more quality datasets. A common LD model should improve the accessibility/interoperability of different datasets and ease the development of a common toolset. > > Regards, > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Pavel Velikhov <pavel.velikhov@gmail.com <mailto:pavel.velikhov@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, I was late for the call today, looked up CEST incorrectly. And at the end of the call something happened to my Skype, seems like nobody could hear me… > > So I’m a bit in the dark about the next steps of the group. > > My interest is quite simple and I think is shared by a number of companies in the industry: we develop technologies for aspect-based sentiment analysis, but both the training data available and benchmark results need a lot more work to be useful. So that’s my main interest and I’d be happy to share all the details of what I think we’re missing now. > С уважением, Павел Велихов pavel.velikhov@gmail.com
Received on Monday, 6 July 2015 11:58:07 UTC