- From: J. Fernando Sánchez <jfernando@dit.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:48:18 +0200
- To: "public-sentiment@w3.org" <public-sentiment@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAP=SOLZgtEit33hOGK3xK=amzPSknHOxx81zj0KEptmpJ-7F=w@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, This is a kind reminder of our meeting tomorrow at 13.00 CEST. Please, remember to add your contributions to the google doc throughout the day. Regards. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:35 PM, J. Fernando Sánchez <jfernando@dit.upm.es> wrote: > Dear all, > > You can find the minutes of the meeting here: > https://www.w3.org/community/sentiment/wiki/Meetings > > To those of you who joined: thank you. Feel free to add anything I might > have missed and remove anything that should not be public. > > The summary is that we need a better review the state of the art for a > comprehensive survey. We defined some action points, which we will check in > our next meeting on *7th July, 13.00 CEST*. > > @Pavel, welcome to the community group!. I believe aspect-based sentiment > analysis is an important use case for us, and it is also in our interest to > have more quality datasets. A common LD model should improve the > accessibility/interoperability of different datasets and ease the > development of a common toolset. > > Regards, > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Pavel Velikhov <pavel.velikhov@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, I was late for the call today, looked up CEST incorrectly. And at the >> end of the call something happened to my Skype, seems like nobody could >> hear me… >> >> So I’m a bit in the dark about the next steps of the group. >> >> My interest is quite simple and I think is shared by a number of >> companies in the industry: we develop technologies for aspect-based >> sentiment analysis, but both the training data available and benchmark >> results need a lot more work to be useful. So that’s my main interest and >> I’d be happy to share all the details of what I think we’re missing now. >> >
Received on Monday, 6 July 2015 11:49:05 UTC