Re: state of the art

Thanks for keeping up the discussion

I agree that twine may not be 'open' and ideal, however basically anyone can
add things to twine, while the ESW I am not sure we can all edit? (sorry if
I am out of date on developments there).

Also, does anyone else thinks that the GUI of the page below could be
improved and wonder if that tells something :

 http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebUsability


Also, ideally,  shouldnt we all be able to publish thing where we favour,
and then link them?

do we need an ontology of semantic web usability expressed in RDF? or
something?

I would like to link our workshop stuff papers, presentations etc) from ASWC
in Bangkok, too



On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> twine is closed, I would rather propose to use the ESW wiki by W3C.
>
> I can't contribute nor coordinate this the next months, I just moved to
> vienna
> and need to get internet and other things....
>
> best
> Leo
>
> It was Tim rdf who said at the right time 27.06.2009 00:30 the following
> words:
>
> Leo,
>
> I am very much interested in the objectives you outline and would like to
> contribute. I will follow the additions to the wiki.
>
> I created two Twines for Semantic Web Usability a while ago, but have not
> found anyone interested in the topic. Please feel free to tuck things there
> as well -- perhaps we could get some critical mass. Within a twine, we can
> comment on each artifact we post.
>
> http://www.twine.com/twine/116nk1j23-c11/semantic-web-user-interfaces
>
> http://www.twine.com/twine/116nlm5b5-c21/semantic-web-user-interaction
>
> Regards,
> Tim Lebo
>
>
>
>> I like the idea of a collection of state-of-the-art, and will contribute,
>> but only if I can edit myself and am sure that the state-of-the-art will be
>> there the next years in public domain.
>> The place where I am sure that it will remain open, and which is already
>> the place where all other discussions about the Semantic Web happen, is the
>> ESW wiki.
>> I added a page here for you:
>>  http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebUsability
>>
>
>
>
>>
>> Rather, take exsiting tools and compare them against the vision -
>>  can your grandma find a doctor in her neighbourhood that will accept her
>> Health Insurance and treat her illness?
>> (This was the guiding example of "The Semantic Web", 2001, Timbl et al)
>> so - can facetted browisng help?
>> can xy help?
>>
>> etc.
>>
>> best
>> Leo
>>
>> I would also humbly suggest to look at the usability concerns that are
>> addressed in KDE 4.0, which has an RDF based metadata layer.
>> In our NEPOMUK project we are currently working on the biggest deployment
>> of Semantic Web technology (especially RDF) ever, reaching half of all linux
>> users... much usability to study there.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________
> DI Leo Sauermann       http://www.dfki.de/~sauermann <http://www.dfki.de/%7Esauermann>
>
> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer
> Kuenstliche Intelligenz DFKI GmbH
> Trippstadter Strasse 122
> P.O. Box 2080           Fon:   +49 631 20575-116
> D-67663 Kaiserslautern  Fax:   +49 631 20575-102
> Germany                 Mail:  leo.sauermann@dfki.de
>
> Geschaeftsfuehrung:
> Prof.Dr.Dr.h.c.mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
> Dr. Walter Olthoff
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
> Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
> ____________________________________________________
>
>