- From: Lloyd Rutledge <Lloyd.Rutledge@cwi.nl>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 14:37:51 +0200
- To: public-semweb-ui@w3.org, "T.Heath" <T.Heath@open.ac.uk>
Thanks Tom. I've incorporated your comments in the workshop webpage (http://swui.semanticweb.org/swui06/) and in the SWUI SWUI. Details inline. Here's the changed part of the list: # user as author * publishing and sharing * indentity * approachable interfaces # community dymanics * trust * privacy * adoption SWUI SWUI entry points for the categories above are: http://aries.ins.cwi.nl/sesame/explorer/show.jsp?repository=swui&useLabels=yes&value=%3chttp%3a%2f%2fswui%2esemanticweb%2eorg%2fswui%23author%3e http://aries.ins.cwi.nl/sesame/explorer/show.jsp?repository=swui&useLabels=yes&value=%3chttp%3a%2f%2fswui%2esemanticweb%2eorg%2fswui%23community%3e T.Heath wrote: > Hi Lloyd, all, > > This is a really interesting list, and a great focal point for the SWUI > community; very encouraging, thanks :) Taking you up on your offer, I'd > like to offer a couple of comments/propose some changes in three areas: > > 1. Tasks/Goals -> Search/Browse > 2. User as author: publishing/sharing > 3. Personal/social challenges brought about by Semantic Web > > 1. Tasks/Goals -> Search/Browse > I believe the emphasis on search/browse in web usage obscures a real > understanding of the goal of the user. At the same time a semantic web > has the potential to deliver tools that truly support more varied tasks > and activities online; the search engines and point-n-click hypertext of > the conventional web are just one way of seeing the web. On that basis I > think there'd be value in nesting Search and Browse within a category > related to Tasks/Activities in general and how the user experience of > these is changed by a semantic web. I think task and goals should perhaps become one of several "horizontal" issues that apply to most topics. The list has other topics to which changes tasks apply: to search, browse, publish, and others. "New paradigms" may apply across topics as well. Perhaps "approachable" too. I'll work on this. > 2. User as author: publishing/sharing > This deserves a category of its own in my view, divorced from the all > but the last of its three subtopics ("approachable interfaces"). Perhaps > nesting Publishing within a broader Tasks/Activities heading might > highlight some commonalities with a tasks/activities viewpoint. I agree. User as author is a top category, with publishing and sharing with in it. > 3. Personal/social challenges brought about by Semantic Web > The "trust" and "community dymanics" points currently under "user as > author" have broader applicability in my opinion, and may warrant a > category of their own (perhaps something like "Personal/social > challenges brought about by Semantic Web"). This would allow other > related topics such as privacy and identity on the semantic web to be > encompassed. (aside: SW privacy was even discussed by BBC News after > WWW2006, so this issue will certainly be big in the public mind). "Community dynamics" is now a top category, with subcategories. Thanks again, Tom. -Lloyd > Naturally I'd be interested to hear what others think about these ideas > :) > > Best wishes, > > Tom. >
Received on Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:37:15 UTC