- From: Grahame Grieve <grahame@healthintersections.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:34:11 +1000
- To: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>
- Cc: r@iannel.la, "its@lists.hl7.org" <its@lists.hl7.org>, w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAG47hGYq=HqD-NMEPHvRcKw2nVUTf9HKiiX_jcFJ7C_dsX_ktw@mail.gmail.com>
thanks. I'll chat to Harold Grahame On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Marc Twagirumukiza < marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com> wrote: > Hi Graham, > Thanks for this additional info. > The topic was discussed in last 'Semantic Web Health Care and Life > Sciences Interest Group Teleconference' with the ongoing work from Harold > Solbrig and Quoqian Jiang team wrt FHIR RDF Group. I do not know if there's > specifically someone from FHIR involved yet. > See point 3 of the minutes: > https://www.w3.org/2016/05/24-hcls-minutes.html > > From health-lifesci.schema.org side ( extension lead by ScheMed W3C CG > https://www.w3.org/community/schemed/ & http://health-lifesci.schema.org > ) I had preliminary discussion with the Harold team and now we have to find > a way forward. > There's already very interesting exploration and PoC as you will see in > pointers from the minutes. > > Kind Regards, > > * Marc * > > > > From: Grahame Grieve <grahame@healthintersections.com.au> > To: Marc Twagirumukiza/AXPZC/AGFA@AGFA > Cc: r@iannel.la, "its@lists.hl7.org" <its@lists.hl7.org>, w3c > semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> > Date: 26/05/2016 10:16 > Subject: Re: FHIR on schema.org > Sent by: grahameg@gmail.com > ------------------------------ > > > > people are already trying to use FHIR as a standard for sharing their > healthcare data for research. While organizations can't share other > people's data in public, there's plenty of anecdotal evidence that the > people will do it themselves. So the use case isn't impossible, it's only a > policy question, as Marc says > > I'm interested in finding out more about this, how *schema.org* > <http://schema.org/> works with FHIR - is someone from the FHIR community > involved in this effort? > > Grahame > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Marc Twagirumukiza < > *marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com* <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>> wrote: > Hi Renato, > I quite understand your concern. We need to discuss deeply this esp. wrt > the requirements of the W3C Privacy review (understand and implications) . > However it's the responsibility of every one to make its data public or > not. > This doesn't prevent us to provide a *way of expressing data* (for those > who want to do so) with FHIR standard using *schema.org* > <http://schema.org/> > Exposing this to public it's another story and we are not constraining > people to do so. But expressing it (probably share it, under precise > privacy constrains- between APIs) should be encouraged. > > Just for your example, we are already expressing our internal healthcare > data (and EHR data) using *schema.org* <http://schema.org/> (although > they are not public). > This has a benefit when we need to share such data with another APIs and > there HL7 FHIR comes in as a standard. > > Kind Regards, > > * Marc Twagirumukiza * > > > > From: Renato Iannella <*r@iannel.la* <r@iannel.la>> > To: "*its@lists.hl7.org* <its@lists.hl7.org>" <*its@lists.HL7.org* > <its@lists.HL7.org>>, w3c semweb HCLS <*public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org* > <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>> > Date: 26/05/2016 02:04 > Subject: FHIR on *schema.org* <http://schema.org/> > ------------------------------ > > > > I would like to raise a concern about the FHIR on Schema.Org proposal [1] > discussed at the last teleconference [2]. > > The issue is about the conflicting purposes of the two. Schema.org is > (primarily) about publishing structured data via public web pages for > improved search engine experiences. FHIR is (primarily) about healthcare > data about people. > > Clearly, there is a significant Privacy issue with FHIR data, that should > *not* be made on public web pages (for Goggle/Bing to consume), > > How will this issue be addressed? > > (As it stands, the proposal would not meet the requirements of the W3C > Privacy review [3].) > > Renato > > [1] *http://fhir.fhir-schema-org.appspot.com/* > <http://fhir.fhir-schema-org.appspot.com/> > [2] *https://www.w3.org/2016/05/24-hcls-minutes.html#item03* > <https://www.w3.org/2016/05/24-hcls-minutes.html#item03> > [3] *https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/* > <https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/> > > > *********************************************************************************** > *Manage your subscriptions* <http://www.hl7.org/listservice> | *View the > archives* <http://lists.hl7.org/read/?forum=its> | *Unsubscribe* > <http://www.hl7.org/tools/unsubscribe.cfm?email=grahame@healthintersections.com.au&list=its> > | *Terms of use* > <http://www.hl7.org/myhl7/managelistservs.cfm?ref=nav#listrules> > > > > > -- > ----- > *http://www.healthintersections.com.au* > <http://www.healthintersections.com.au/> / > *grahame@healthintersections.com.au* <grahame@healthintersections.com.au> > / +61 411 867 065 > > -- ----- http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grahame@healthintersections.com.au / +61 411 867 065
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2016 08:34:44 UTC