- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:27:39 -0400
- To: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>, amallia@edmondsci.com
- CC: "its@lists.hl7.org" <its@lists.HL7.org>, w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Hi Marc, On 05/19/2015 05:00 AM, Marc Twagirumukiza wrote: > Hi Tony, > > Thanks sharing this new version. I was wondering if we should always add > datatypes. > f.eg on page 26-27-28: > > .coding [ > fhir:Coding.system [fhir:value > “http://example.org/local”^^xsd:string ] ; > fhir:Coding.code [fhir:value "admin"^^xsd:string ] ; > fhir:Coding.display [fhir:value "Admin"^^xsd:string ] ; > ]; > > If we do that in all places we will be compliant with the fixed > requirements > :http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Ontology_Requirements#9._Datatype_IRIs In Turtle 1.1 the default is now xsd:string. The following two statements have exactly the same meaning: [] fhir:value "admin" . [] fhir:value "admin"^^xsd:string . See http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/#h4_turtle-literals "If there is no datatype IRI and no language tag, the datatype is xsd:string." David Booth > > > Kind Regards, > * > Marc Twagirumukiza | **Agfa HealthCare* > Senior Clinical Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research > > http://www.agfahealthcare.com <http://www.agfahealthcare.com/> > http://blog.agfahealthcare.com <http://blog.agfahealthcare.com/> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Click on link to read important disclaimer: > http://www.agfahealthcare.com/maildisclaimer > > > > From: Anthony Mallia <amallia@edmondsci.com> > To: "its@lists.hl7.org" <its@lists.HL7.org>, w3c semweb HCLS > <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> > Date: 19/05/2015 02:45 > Subject: New side by side FHIR RDF comparison > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > I have posted the new version > http://wiki.hl7.org/images/2/25/FHIR_RDF_Sample_side_by_side_comparisons.pdf > > To see all the current stored versions you can go to > http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=File:FHIR_RDF_Sample_side_by_side_comparisons.pdf > > This next version shows terminology binding in a fusion between the > approaches of Grahame and Lloyd. > It brings the singleton instance of the Terminology class right into > Coding/code and it solves the blank node problem there. > There is also some change to the fhir:Reference approach to simplify it > and some initial work on Profile showing ValueSet constraints. > > Tony Mallia > EDMOND SCIENTIFIC COMPANY (ESC) > > > *********************************************************************************** > Manage your subscriptions <http://www.HL7.org/listservice> | View the > archives <http://lists.HL7.org/read/?forum=its> | Unsubscribe > <http://www.HL7.org/tools/unsubscribe.cfm?email=david@dbooth.org&list=its> > | Terms of use > <http://www.HL7.org/myhl7/managelistservs.cfm?ref=nav#listrules> >
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2015 13:28:09 UTC