Re: Best IRI for the term "probe"

This should work:

http://www.sequenceontology.org/miso/release_2.4/term/SO:0000051
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:36 PM Anders Riutta <
anders.riutta@gladstone.ucsf.edu> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for opinions on the best IRI to use when referring to the term
> "probe" to describe the subject matter of a dataset. The IRI should cover
> all items like [1] or [2] from providers such as:
> * Affymetrix Probeset
> * Agilent
> * CodeLink
> * Illumina
> * Wheat gene refs
>
> At present, I'm planning to go with dcterms:subject and "macromolecular
> probe" (from the Biological imaging methods ontology) like this:
>
> <http://identifiers.org/affy.probeset>
>     <http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject>
>     <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/FBbi_00000410> .
>
> Thanks!
> Anders Riutta
> Gladstone Institutes
>
> [1] https://www.affymetrix.com/LinkServlet?probeset=1851_s_at
> [2] http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/cgi-bin/graingenes/report.cgi?class
> =reference&name=WGS-95-1333
>
>