- From: Oliver Ruebenacker <curoli@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:50:31 -0400
- To: Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>
- Cc: "Gray, Alasdair J G" <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>, HCLS IG <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAA=X4ODcoSvNSwaH=dPSg5PjM8y4WyxbfinmNTsjU_LJiWF0ww@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu> wrote: > Hi Alasdair, > > I think you are closing the world the wrong way. Both in limiting a > dataset to have one license and secondly by having an "unknown" string > to encode that you don't know something. > Instead of using "unknown" you should use a blank node. > > cc:CC0 owl:sameAs "unknown" > > is plain wrong and can't be inferred > > cc:CC0 owl:sameAs _:1 > Not sure what that is supposed to achieve. > > is fine and a nice way of allowing dataset from different sources > descriptions to be combined and give more information. > > If you don't want a blank node, make a local node instead. > cc:CC0 owl:sameAs <./#license> > What is a local node? Best, Oliver > > I implore you to change your mind on this. Choose semantics over special > values! > > Regards, > Jerven > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Gray, Alasdair J G <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk> > wrote: > > Hi Jerven, > > > > We are trying to ensure that a license is provided for a dataset, and > that > > only one license is provided. (We are closing the world in certain > areas.) > > > > Our proposed solution is written up at > > https://github.com/joejimbo/HCLSDatasetDescriptions/issues/65 > > > > Alasdair > > > > On 2 Jun 2014, at 16:47, Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu> wrote: > > > > Hi Alasdair, > > > > It is good practice in my opinion to not state unknown facts. If you > > want to state there should be a license but you don't know it I think > > some owl modelling is called for. > > > > e.g. roughly like this. > > > > dusty_data a dct:Dataset . > > dusty_data rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; > > owl:onProperty dct:license ; > > owl:minCardinality 1 ] > > > > > > If anyone does something like > > > > dusty_data a dct:dataset . > > dusty_data dct:license bad_example:unknown_license . > > > > and then someone figures out it has a license . > > > > dusty_data a dct:Dataset . > > dusty_data dct:license cc:zero . > > > > And puts all those triples into one store/ontology then queries will > > start to return wrong data. > > > > SELECT ?datasetWithALicense > > WHERE { > > ?datasetWithALicense dct:license ?license . > > } > > > > Will give 2 bindings for ?dataset and ?license one of them being wrong > now. > > > > If you ask the same question depending on the better modelling then > > you get the correct answer in both cases. > > > > SELECT ?datasetWIthoutLicense > > WHERE { > > ?datasetWIthoutLicense a dct;Dataset . > > MINUS ( ?datasetWIthoutLicense dct:license ?license ) > > } > > > > SELECT ?datasetWIthALicense > > WHERE { > > ?datasetWIthALicense a dct;Dataset . > > ?datasetWIthALicense dct:license ?license . > > } > > > > Both give the expected results. > > > > > > In general in RDF just state what you know and describe what you don't > know. > > > > Regards, > > Jerven > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Gray, Alasdair J G <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk> > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am working to help shape the Healthcare and Life Sciences community > > profile for describing datasets, current version available from [1] > > > > One of our goals is that there is a minimal set of properties that are > > available for all datasets, and we would like these properties to include > > the license. However we have the problem that for several legacy datasets > > the license is simply unknown. Does anyone know of a resource that can be > > used to represent that the license is unknown as the value of a > > dcterms:license predicate? > > > > Thanks > > > > Alasdair > > > > [1] https://github.com/joejimbo/HCLSDatasetDescriptions > > > > Alasdair J G Gray > > Lecturer in Computer Science, Heriot-Watt University, UK. > > Email: A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk > > Web: MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from > > "www.macs.hw.ac.uk" claiming to be http://www.alasdairjggray.co.uk > > ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-4872 > > Telephone: +44 131 451 3429 > > Twitter: @gray_alasdair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2011-2013 > > Top in the UK for student experience > > Fourth university in the UK and top in Scotland (National Student Survey > > 2012) > > > > We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to > join us > > in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary themes. Please > see > > www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and how to apply. > > > > Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity > number > > SC000278. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jerven Bolleman > > me@jerven.eu > > > > > > Alasdair J G Gray > > Lecturer in Computer Science, Heriot-Watt University, UK. > > Email: A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk > > Web: MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from > > "www.macs.hw.ac.uk" claiming to be http://www.alasdairjggray.co.uk > > ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-4872 > > Telephone: +44 131 451 3429 > > Twitter: @gray_alasdair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2011-2013 > > Top in the UK for student experience > > Fourth university in the UK and top in Scotland (National Student Survey > > 2012) > > > > We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to > join us > > in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary themes. Please > see > > www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and how to apply. > > > > Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity > number > > SC000278. > > > > -- > Jerven Bolleman > me@jerven.eu > > -- Oliver Ruebenacker Founder at Relomics Consulting <http://www.relomics.com> Be always grateful, but never satisfied.
Received on Monday, 16 June 2014 17:51:01 UTC